Laguna
Given that they were built 40 years ago, I am going to say no. The current goings on show how well built and planned they actually were, especially compared to Chernobyl.
Hartford
We have Nuclear Powered Subs, we have nuclear powered Aircraft Carriers, if Nuclear power is not safe, why are we subjecting our military to this unsafe power and yet we get no outrage, and these Nuclear plants are mobile where the "melt down" can occur anywhere in the world.
Loachapoka
Nuclear powerplants are still what America needs. We have plenty of areas in the country that are safe from fault lines, and we have the ability to build strong enough plants to survive a direct impact from a 747.I guess you prefer to burn coal, or live in the dark.
Snow Shoe
No. Within 1 year, when the clean-up is in full swing, they'll be building NEW nuclear power plants to replace the old ones.
Friendly
It means that before and after the shaking that Obama's Political Ambitions are toast...
Laddonia
Sure, let's use up all the oil, then worry about what to do next.
Industry
probably he will fall on his sword
Punta Santiago
no
Nuclear fans does smoke rising from yet another ill planned nuclear reactor mean that japan gets a new pm?
Labels:
consumer level nuclear reactor,
iraq nuclear reactor bombed,
kinshasa nuclear reactor,
nebraska nuclear reactor,
nuclear fusion power reactors,
nuclear reactor,
nuclear reactor analysis hamilton,
nuclear reactor applications,
water in a nuclear reactor
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
